|
|
Registros recuperados : 1 | |
1. | | BASTIN, J. F.; RUTISHAUSER, E.; KELLNER, J. R.; SAATCHI, S.; PÉLISSIER, R.; HÉRAULT, B.; SLIK, F.; BOGAERT, J.; DE CANNIÈRE, C.; MARSHALL, A. R.; POULSEN, J.; ALVAREZ-LOYAYZA, P.; ANDRADE, A.; ANGBONGA-BASIA, A.; ARAUJO-MURAKAMI, A.; ARROYO, L.; AYYAPPAN, N.; AZEVEDO, C. P. de; BANKI, O.; BARBIER, N.; BARROSO, J. G.; BEECKMAN, H.; BITARIHO, R.; BOECKX, P.; BOEHNING-GAESE, K.; BRANDÃO, H.; BREARLEY, F. Q.; HOCKEMBA, M. B. N.; BRIENEN, R.; CAMARGO, J. L. C.; CAMPOS-ARCEIZ, A.; CASSART, B.; CHAVE, J.; CHAZDON, R.; CHUYONG, G.; CLARK, D. B.; CLARK, C. J.; CONDIT, R.; CORONADO, E. N. H.; DAVIDAR, P.; HAULLEVILLE, T. de; DESCROIX, L.; DOUCET, J-L.; DOURDAIN, A.; DROISSART, V.; DUNCAN, T.; ESPEJO. J. S.; ESPINOSA, S.; FARWIG, N.; FAYOLLE, A.; FELDPAUSCH, T. R.; FERRAZ, A.; FLETCHER, C.; GAJAPERSAD, K.; GILLET, J-F.; AMARAL, I. L. do; GONMADJE, C.; GROGAN, J.; HARRIS, D.; HERZOG, S. K.; HOMEIER, J.; HUBAU, W.; HUBBELL, S. P.; HUFKENS, K.; HURTADO, J.; KAMDEM, N. G.; KEARSLEY, E.; KENFACK, D.; KESSLER, M.; LABRIÈRE, N.; LAUMONIER, Y.; LAURANCE, S.; LAURANCE, W. F.; LEWIS, S. L.; LIBALAH, M. B.; LIGOT, G.; LLOYD, J.; LOVEJOY, T. E.; MALHI, Y.; MARIMON, B. S.; JUNIOR, B. H. M.; MARTIN, E. H.; MATIUS, P.; MEYER, V.; BAUTISTA, C. M.; MONTEAGUDO-MENDOZA, A.; MTUI, A.; NEILL, D.; GUTIERREZ, G. A. P.; PARDO, G.; PARREN, M.; PARTHASARATHY, N.; PHILLIPS, O. L.; PITMAN, N. C. A.; PLOTON, P.; PONETTE, Q.; RAMESH, B. R.; RAZAFIMAHAIMODISON, J-C.; RÉJOU-MÉCHAIN, M.; ROLIM, S. G.; SALTOS, H. R.; ROSSI, L. M. B.; SPIRONELLO, W. R.; ROVERO, F.; SANER, P.; SASAKI, D.; SCHULZE, M.; SILVEIRA, M.; SINGH, J.; SIST, P.; SONKE, B.; SOTO, J. D.; SOUZA, C. R. de; STROPP, J.; SULLIVAN, M. J. P.; SWANEPOEL, B.; STEEGE, H. ter.; TERBORGH, J.; TEXIER, N.; TOMA, T.; VALENCIA, R.; VALENZUELA, L.; FERREIRA, L. V.; VALVERDE, F. C.; ANDEL, T. R. van.; VASQUE, R.; VERBEECK, H.; VIVEK, P.; VLEMINCKX, J.; VOS, V. A.; WAGNER, F. H.; WARSUDI, P. P.; WORTEL, V.; ZAGT, R. J.; ZEBAZE, D. Pan-tropical prediction of forest structure from the largest trees. Global Ecology and Biogeography, v. 27, n. 11, p. 1366-1383, Nov. 2018. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
Data corrente: |
04/10/2021 |
Data da última atualização: |
10/04/2024 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
MADARI, B. E.; CARVALHO, M. T. de M.; OLIVEIRA, J. de M.; SILVEIRA, A. l. R. da; FREITAS, F. M. C.; KOAKUZU, S. N.; SIQUEIRA, M. M. de B.; ARAÚJO, W. A. de; PACHECO, A. R.; MACHADO, P. L. O. de A. |
Afiliação: |
BEATA EMOKE MADARI, CNPAF; MARCIA THAIS DE MELO CARVALHO, CNPAF; JANAÍNA DE MOURA OLIVEIRA; ANDRÉ LUIZ RODRIGUES DA SILVEIRA, FACULDADE ARAGUAIA; FERNANDA MARA CUNHA FREITAS, CNPGL; SELMA NAKAMOTO KOAKUZU, CNPAF; MATHEUS MENTONE DE BRITTO SIQUEIRA; WILKER ALVES DE ARAÚJO; ABILIO RODRIGUES PACHECO, CNPF; PEDRO LUIZ OLIVEIRA DE A MACHADO, CNPAF. |
Título: |
Soil carbon stocks at 3 and 11 years of an integrated Crop-Livestock-Forestry system on a clayey ferralsol in the Brazilian savanna. |
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: WORLD CONGRESS ON INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK-FORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2., 2021. Proceedings reference. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2021. |
Páginas: |
p. 72-78. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Notas: |
WCCLF 2021.
Evento online. |
Conteúdo: |
Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forestry systems (ICLF) are potential carbon sinks. Here we present soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in an ICLF system at 3 and 11 years after implementation. The ICLF was implemented in 2008/2009 at Boa Vereda farm, in Cachoeira Dourada, Goiás state, Central-West region of Brazil, on a clay Ferralsol. SOC stocks were determined within rows of trees and between rows of trees, hereby called alley, in three soil layers (0.0-0.3, 0.3-1.0 and 0.0-1.0 m) in 2012 and 2020. A non-cultivated pasture was used as reference. Results show a trend for increased soil C stocks at 0.0-1.0 m under ICLF system from 3 to 11 years after implementation compared to the non-cultivated pasture. There was also a higher C accumulation rate under ILPF at this soil layer, compared to the same pasture. All treatments lost C at 0.3-1.0 m, but the noncultivated pasture lost C the most rapidly. At 0.0-0.3 m all treatments gained C over time. These data only relate to the effect of the presence of trees in the ICLF, weighted COS stocks from tree-rows and alleys were not calculated in this paper. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Sequestro de carbono. |
Thesagro: |
Carbono; Estoque; Eucalipto; Gado de Corte; Sistema de Cultivo; Solo. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Beef cattle; Carbon sequestration; Eucalyptus. |
Categoria do assunto: |
A Sistemas de Cultivo |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/226503/1/wcclf2021-p72.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02269nam a2200361 a 4500 001 2135015 005 2024-04-10 008 2021 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 100 1 $aMADARI, B. E. 245 $aSoil carbon stocks at 3 and 11 years of an integrated Crop-Livestock-Forestry system on a clayey ferralsol in the Brazilian savanna.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: WORLD CONGRESS ON INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK-FORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2., 2021. Proceedings reference. Brasília, DF: Embrapa$c2021 300 $ap. 72-78. 500 $aWCCLF 2021. Evento online. 520 $aIntegrated Crop-Livestock-Forestry systems (ICLF) are potential carbon sinks. Here we present soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in an ICLF system at 3 and 11 years after implementation. The ICLF was implemented in 2008/2009 at Boa Vereda farm, in Cachoeira Dourada, Goiás state, Central-West region of Brazil, on a clay Ferralsol. SOC stocks were determined within rows of trees and between rows of trees, hereby called alley, in three soil layers (0.0-0.3, 0.3-1.0 and 0.0-1.0 m) in 2012 and 2020. A non-cultivated pasture was used as reference. Results show a trend for increased soil C stocks at 0.0-1.0 m under ICLF system from 3 to 11 years after implementation compared to the non-cultivated pasture. There was also a higher C accumulation rate under ILPF at this soil layer, compared to the same pasture. All treatments lost C at 0.3-1.0 m, but the noncultivated pasture lost C the most rapidly. At 0.0-0.3 m all treatments gained C over time. These data only relate to the effect of the presence of trees in the ICLF, weighted COS stocks from tree-rows and alleys were not calculated in this paper. 650 $aBeef cattle 650 $aCarbon sequestration 650 $aEucalyptus 650 $aCarbono 650 $aEstoque 650 $aEucalipto 650 $aGado de Corte 650 $aSistema de Cultivo 650 $aSolo 653 $aSequestro de carbono 700 1 $aCARVALHO, M. T. de M. 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, J. de M. 700 1 $aSILVEIRA, A. l. R. da 700 1 $aFREITAS, F. M. C. 700 1 $aKOAKUZU, S. N. 700 1 $aSIQUEIRA, M. M. de B. 700 1 $aARAÚJO, W. A. de 700 1 $aPACHECO, A. R. 700 1 $aMACHADO, P. L. O. de A.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|